Camila Florez Bossio has recently received the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et culture doctoral research scholarship! These funds will be used to continue Camila’s research on the adaptive capacity to climate change threats to water security in urban areas, using Lima, Peru as a case study:
I’m examining how urban areas of developing countries deal with climate change threats, and how urban citizens capacity to adapt materializes into adaptive behavior. To achieve this, I’m developing a conceptual framework for understanding adaptation of residents of urban areas in developing countries, while using a mixed-methods approach to study urban adaptive capacity in Lima, Peru.
In the latest assessment report from the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Professor Ford leads authorship on two chapters. The report in whole focuses on presenting 1) approaches to adaptation, 2) trends and implications of climatic changes, 3) trends and implications of soci0-economic changes, 4) and the cross cutting findings and adaptation options available.
Professor Ford leads chapters centered in the forth topic where adaptation resilience is examined (chapter 11) and a summary of adaptation options for the BBDS region concludes the report (chapter 12). Assessment reports such as this play an important role in informing policy and complimenting academic papers.
Explore the report yourself here.
How Do Capital Asset Interactions Affect Livelihood Sensitivity to Climatic Stresses? Insights From the Northeastern Floodplains of Bangladesh
Tuihedur Rahman, H.M, Robinson, B., Ford, J., Hickey, G. (2018) How Do Capital Asset Interactions Affect Livelihood Sensitivity to Climatic Stresses? Insights From the Northeastern Floodplains of Bangladesh. Ecological Economics, 150, 165 – 176.
This paper offers a novel methodological approach for better understanding how different capital assets can be organized, transformed, and used in different combinations to reduce livelihood sensitivity to climatic stresses – an area that requires greater research attention in the context of adaptation policy. Research was conducted in the northeastern floodplain communities of Bangladesh, regarded as one of the most climate sensitive, resource poor, and highly understudied areas of the country. This wetland-dominated ecosystem is home to diverse resources user groups (e.g., farmer and fisher) who are subjected to regular seasonal flooding, excessive rainfall, drought, and flash floods. Working in 12 adjacent villages of two significant wetlands (Hakaluki haor and Tanguar haor), qualitative and quantitative data were collected through 15 focus groups (n = 15), 35 key informant interviews, and 356 household surveys to better understand how community members adapt in response to their livelihood sensitivity to the climatic stresses. Results indicate that community members organize and transform capital assets in diverse ways to escape climate-induced “poverty traps”. Findings also reveal that interventions from external agencies (e.g., government, non-governmental organizations and market institutions) are an important key to livelihood sustainability for many households.
Wang, F., Ford, J., Lesnikowski, A., Chen, C., Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Heymann, J., Grecequet, M., Huq, S. (2018) Assessing stakeholder needs for adaptation tracking. UNEP DTU Partnership, Perspectives Series, 1.
Faced with the increasing and irreversible impacts of climate change, a growing number of public and private stakeholders across vulnerable sectors are engaging in adaptation efforts. However, our knowledge is limited regarding the types of information being demanded in order to track adaptation progress nationally. To address this gap, we conducted a needs assessment of 191 public and private stakeholder organizations. Stakeholder needs are classified into fourteen themes, encompassing measurements in implementation, outcome and learning, data availability and methods, and crosscutting aspects. With approximately half of organizations surveyed expressing a need for adaptation tracking, we conclude that there is significant demand for: 1) translating climate risk data into impacts and damage costs; 2) monitoring institutional and policy coordination and coherence; and 3) evaluating adaptation outputs and outcomes to inform decision-making.
Preparing for the health impacts of climate change in Indigenous communities: The role of community-based adaptation
Ford, J., Sherman, M., Berrang-Ford, L., Llanos, A., Carcamo, C., Harper, S., Lwasa, S., Namanya, D., Marcello, T., Maillet, M., Edge, V. (2018). Preparing for the health impacts of climate change in Indigenous communities: The role of community-based adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 49, 129-139.
Climate change presents substantial risks to the health of Indigenous peoples. Research is needed to inform health policy and practice for managing risks, with community based adaptation (CBA) emerging as one approach to conducting research to support such efforts. Few, if any, studies however, have critically examined the application of CBA in a health or Indigenous peoples context. We examine the strengths, challenges, and opportunities of health-related CBA research in Indigenous community settings, drawing on the experiences of the multi-nation interdisciplinary Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change (IHACC) project. Data collection was guided by a framework developed to evaluate CBA projects. Semi-structured interviews (n = 114) and focus groups (n = 23, 177 participants) were conducted with faculty-based researchers, institutional partners, community members, students, and trainees involved in the IHACC project in Canada, Uganda, and Peru. Results illustrate the importance of CBA in co-generating knowledge on climate-health vulnerability and adaptation options, capacity building, and informing decision choices. There are also significant challenges of conducting CBA which can have unintended negative consequences, with results emphasizing the importance of managing the tension between health research and tangible and immediate benefits; developing a working architecture for collective impact, including team building, identification of common goals, and meaningful engagement of knowledge users; and the need to continuously monitor and evaluate progress. CBA holds significant promise in a health adaptation context, but only in the ‘right’ circumstances, where considerable time is spent developing the work with partners.